Most people know what it feels like to be caught in a loop of anxious thinking. A worry
arrives, feels urgent and completely true, and before long, it has crowded out everything else and becomes crippling in nature. A Yuva Bhagavatam session led by Sri Ramuji on resilience recently brought us together to explore exactly this: why anxiety tends to narrow our thinking down to worst-case scenarios, and what we can do to widen the lens again so it is not so crippling. The session drew on a tool called the “Resilience Reframe”. The core message was that anxiety is not a character flaw, and it is not permanent. It follows predictable patterns, and once those patterns are understood, they become far easier to interrupt.
No Single Fix: But a Good Starting Point
Anxiety is not one-size-fits-all. It shows up differently depending on the person, the situation, and the particular thinking habits involved. What works for one individual may not work for another, and any honest approach to work towards your mental wellbeing has to start by acknowledging that.
That said, two practices consistently emerge as broadly beneficial starting points:
Gratitude and Reframing. Together, they build the capacity to hold a difficult situation without being completely defined by it.
Gratitude is the practice of deliberately noticing what is present and working, even when
things are hard. Reframing is the practice of questioning automatic, anxious interpretations and generating more balanced alternatives. Used consistently, they do not make hard things easy, but they do make it easier to move through them.
The Patterns Beneath the Worry: Cognitive Distortions
Anxiety rarely arrives as a vague unease. More often, it comes packaged in very specific
thought patterns that feel entirely logical in the moment but, on further examination, are skewed or exaggerated. Psychologists call these cognitive distortions, and they are far more common than most people realise.
Recognising them is not about criticising or judging yourself for thinking this way. These
patterns are automatic and experienced by almost everyone at some point. The value in naming them is simply this: a thought that has been identified and labelled is much harder to mistake for an objective fact.
Here are the most commonly observed distortions:
1. All-or-Nothing Thinking: Seeing only extremes, either complete success or total failure,
with nothing in between acknowledged as real or valid.
2. Catastrophizing: Jumping straight to the worst possible outcome and treating it as the
only realistic one. “If this goes wrong, everything is ruined.”
3. Mental Filtering: Zeroing in on the one critical comment while the broader positive
picture goes unnoticed.
4. Disqualifying the Positive(s): Brushing off good things as flukes or exceptions, so they
never improve how we feel about ourselves.
5. Overgeneralizing: Turning one bad experience into a permanent, universal truth. “I failed once. I always fail. I will never succeed.”
6. Jumping to Conclusions: Assuming the worst without evidence, either by reading others’ minds or predicting bad outcomes before they happen.
7. Emotional Reasoning: Treating feelings as evidence of reality. “I feel like a failure”
becomes “I am a failure.”
8. Labelling: Reducing a complex person, yourself, or someone else, to a single, fixed,
negative word.
9. Personalization: Taking on disproportionate blame or responsibility for things that were partly or wholly outside your control.
10. Should/Must Statements: Holding yourself to rigid internal rules that generate guilt and a constant sense of falling short.
Looking at a list like this, many people recognize several of these patterns in their own thinking, sometimes all of them. That recognition is not a cause for concern but the beginning of the work.
The Resilience Reframe: Working Through It Step by Step
These insights above give us the first step in the Resilience Reframe. Rather than simply
understanding that anxious thoughts can be distorted, it provides a structured method for actually generating alternatives to reframe our thought process. The process does not ask anyone to pretend they are not worried or just the initial thought; it asks them to check whether the worry is the whole story.
The steps below follow the framework from our session, illustrated through a scenario some people will recognize and may relate to: health anxiety/waiting for test results.
Step 1: Describe the situation
Write down what is actually happening, in plain factual terms, verbatim, no judgment and
no interpretation yet.
Example: “I had a routine blood test last week, and my doctor has asked me to
come back to discuss the results.”
Step 2: Name the worry
Write the anxious/worry thought out in full, exactly as it arises, even if it sounds harsh or
irrational.
Example: “Something must be seriously wrong. If it were fine, they would have just
said so. I probably have something terrible, and my life is about to change
completely.”
Step 3: Catch the automatic thought and identify the distortion
Look at what you wrote and find the pattern. In this case, mental filtering and
catastrophizing: assuming the worst from limited information, and treating an uncertain
outcome as already decided and devastating.
Step 4: Reframe: What is controllable?
Shift focus to what can actually be done.
Example: “I can attend the appointment, write down any questions I want to ask, and
bring someone with me for support. I can avoid spending hours searching symptoms
online before I have actual information.”
Step 5: Reframe: What is learnable?
Consider what can be gained regardless of the outcome.
Example: “Whatever the result, I will have more information than I do now.
Information gives me something real to work with, rather than existing in dread.”
Step 6: Reframe: What is temporary?
In this case, we can zoom out in time.
Example: “This period of not knowing is genuinely hard, but the appointment will
happen, I will know more, and I will be able to respond to what is actually true
rather than what I am imagining.”
Step 7: Choose a Power thought
Review the three reframes and select the one that feels most empowering. Write it down
and return to it when the worry/anxiety resurfaces. Example: “Not knowing is not the same as knowing the worst. I can get through the wait, and I will deal with what is real when I have it.”
Step 8: Reflect
Close the exercise with a few honest questions: Which reframe helped most? Did the
anxiety shift at all? How could this approach be applied to future worries? Did you notice
that worry and possibility were able to coexist?
Why does this work?
Anxiety, at its core, is a narrowing phenomenon: it reduces the perceived range of
possible outcomes and meanings down to a single, typically threatening, interpretation.
The act of deliberately generating three distinct reframes, around control, learning, and time, directly counters this narrowing. Sometimes it is not enough to simply tell yourself or someone to “think positively.” The structured requirement to produce multiple alternatives challenges the automatic assumption that a single reading of a situation is the only valid one. Equally important is what this framework does not ask people to do. It doesn’t ask for denial of difficulty, suppression of genuine emotion, or the performance of optimism. The original worry remains present, and the reframes exist in conjunction. The insight that tends to emerge is that holding more than one perspective at once is not only possible, it is a more accurate representation of reality and a widening of perspective than any single interpretation, anxious or otherwise.
Building the Habit Over Time
Like most skills, cognitive reframing becomes more natural with consistent practice. In
the early stages, working through the steps can feel difficult, even slightly artificial. That is
normal. The value of the framework is that while it does not feel easy or natural immediately, it builds a mental habit that, over time, begins to operate more automatically. Paired with a regular gratitude practice, the Resilience Reframe offers an accessible foundation for mental well-being. Neither tool claims to solve everything, but both give people something genuinely useful, which is a way of engaging with difficult thoughts rather than being swept along by them.
Taking It Forward
Our Yuva session ended with a simple observation: both worry and possibility can exist
in the same situation at the same time. Most anxious thinking operates as though this were not true, as though the worst-case reading cancels out everything else. The Resilience Reframing mechanism is, in essence, a repeated practice of proving that wrong.
For anyone who has ever found themselves stuck in a loop of worst-case thinking, which is to say, for most people at some point, that is a genuinely useful thing to know.
Gratitude practice complements this work by building a baseline toward what is present and functional, even during difficult periods. Together, these two practices, reframing and gratitude, constitute a foundation for mental well-being throughout different kinds of experiences.
By Kishori Prakash, Dallas, TX
Illustration: ChatGPT
**************************************************
Click here to go back to Apr 2026 newsletter contents page:
https://godivinity.org/newsletters/nama-dwaar-newsletter-april-2026/
